Search Results

Described in this paper is a component test methodology to evaluate the door trim armrest performance in an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) side impact test and to predict the SID-IIs abdomen injury metrics (rib deflection, deflection rate and V*C). The test methodology consisted of a sub-assembly of two SID-IIs abdomen ribs with spine box, mounted on a linear bearing and allowed to translate in the direction of impact. The spine box with the assembly of two abdominal ribs was rigidly attached to the sliding test fixture, and is stationary at the start of the test. The door trim armrest was mounted on the impactor, which was prescribed the door velocity profile obtained from full-vehicle test. The location and orientation of the armrest relative to the dummy abdomen ribs was maintained the same as in the full-vehicle test.

An assessment tool was developed for rollover CAE signals evaluation to assess primarily the qualities of CAE generated sensor waveforms. This is a key tool to be used to assess CAE results as to whether they can be used for algorithm calibration and identify areas for further improvement of sensor. Currently, the method is developed using error estimates on mean, peak and standard deviation. More metrics, if necessary, can be added to the assessment tool in the future. This method has been applied to various simulated signals for laboratory-based rollover test modes with rigid-body-based MADYDO models.

CAE has played a key role in development of the rollover safety technology by reducing the required number of prototypes. CAE-led Design Of Experiments (DOE) studies have helped in developing the process to minimize the number of CAE runs and to optimize use of the prototypes. This paper demonstrates the use of CAE/DOE for the design and optimization of rollover vehicle prototypes and also investigates effects of various factors in the selection of vehicle configuration for rollover sensor calibration testing. The process described herein has been successfully applied to vehicle programs. Modeling and analysis guidelines are also presented for CAE engineers to help in optimizing vehicle prototypes at program level.

State of the art electronic restraint systems rely on the acceleration measured during a vehicle crash for deployment decisions. The acceleration signal is analyzed with different criteria, among which the velocity change is a dominant criterion in almost any existing crash detection algorithm. Sensors in the front crush zone have recently been added to help develop restraint systems that comply with the new FMVSS208 and EuroNCAP regulations. Front crash sensors are usually evaluated for their velocity change during a crash and typically play a key role in the deployment decision. CAE based FEA analysis has recently been used to generate signals at the sensor module locations in crash simulations to provide supplemental information for crash sensing algorithm development and calibration. This paper presents an initial effort in developing a velocity-based crash detection algorithm, that allows broad use of CAE generated velocity time histories for system calibration.

This paper presents an image analysis of a laboratory-based rollover crash test using camera-matching photogrammetry. The procedures pertaining to setup, analysis and data process used in this method are outlined. Vehicle roll angle and rate calculated using the method are presented and compared to the measured values obtained using a vehicle mounted angular rate sensor. Areas for improvement, accuracy determination, and vehicle kinematics analysis are discussed. This paper concludes that the photogrammetric method presented is a useful tool to extract vehicle roll angle data from test video. However, development of a robust post-processing tool for general application to crash safety analysis requires further exploration.

Head Impact Criterion (HIC) numbers obtained from interior head impact testing with the NHTSA-designed Free Motion Headform (FMH) are influenced by many variables. The high level of variability experienced in the NHTSA-proposed Interior Head Impact Test presents a challenge to today's automotive engineers. Primary contributors to HIC variability include (1) impact speed, (2) headform calibration performance, (3) design/build part variation, and (4) target point impact accuracy. This study shows that controlling these variables during testing can improve test data repeatability and reproducibility, as well as reduce design and testing time.