Search Results

Transient road disturbances excite complex vehicle responses involving the interaction of suspension/chassis, powertrain, and body systems. Typical ones are due to the interactions between tires and road expansion joints, railway crossings and other road discontinuities. Such transient disturbances are generally perceived as “impact harshness” due to the harshness perception as sensed by drivers through both sound and vibration. This paper presents a study of quantifying the effects of sound, steering wheel and seat/floorpan vibrations on the overall perception of the “impact harshness” during impact transient events. The Vehicle Vibration Simulator (VVS) of the Ford Research Laboratory was used to conduct this study. The results of the study show that sound and vibration have approximately equal impact on the overall perception of impact harshness. There is no evidence of interaction between sound and vibration.

It is well known that customer perception of the annoyance of steady-state wind noise can be fairly well characterized by calculating the loudness of such sounds. Commonly used is the ISO532B or Zwicker method [1]. What is not known, however, is how a customer would react to time-varying wind noise. Such situations can occur when a vehicle experiences cross-wind conditions on the highway. Turbulent air flow generated by either a passing vehicle or when traveling in the wake of another vehicle can cause the wind noise to take on time-varying characteristics. The time-varying wind noise created by such situations is commonly referred to as “buffeting.” Customer complaint field data indicates that wind buffeting is a source of annoyance, but the level of the effect has never been quantified. In this study, binaural sounds were recorded inside an aeroacoustic wind tunnel. Varying degrees of buffeting were simulated using a “blocker” vehicle situated in front of the test vehicle.