Search Results

The reliable prediction of pollutant emissions generated by IC engine powertrains during the WLTP driving cycle is a key aspect to test and optimize different configurations, in order to respect the stringent emission limits. This work describes the application of an integrated modeling tool in a co-simulation environment, coupling a 1D fluid dynamic code for engine simulation with a specific numerical code for aftertreatment modelling by means of a robust numerical approach, to achieve a complete methodology for detailed simulations of driving cycles. The main goal is to allow an accurate 1D simulation of the unsteady flows along the intake and exhaust systems and to apply advanced thermodynamic combustion models for the calculation of cylinder-out emissions.

The accurate prediction of pollutant emissions generated by IC engines is a key aspect to guarantee the respect of the emission regulation legislation. This paper describes the approach followed by the authors to achieve a strict numerical coupling of two different 1D modeling tools in a co-simulation environment, aiming at a reliable calculation of engine-out and tailpipe emissions. The main idea is to allow an accurate 1D simulation of the unsteady flows and wave motion inside the intake and exhaust systems, without resorting to an over-simplified geometrical discretization, and to rely on advanced thermodynamic combustion models and kinetic sub-models for the calculation of cylinder-out emissions. A specific fluid dynamic approach is then used to track the chemical composition along the exhaust duct-system, in order to evaluate the conversion efficiency of after-treatment devices, such as TWC, GPF, DPF, DOC, SCR and so on.

To achieve low tailpipe NOX emissions in Heavy-Duty engines, the rapid warm-up of the exhaust aftertreatment system (EAS) needs to be assisted by the adoption of new technologies to reduce engine-out emissions and increase the EAS conversion efficiency. Engine measures like cylinder deactivation, retarded start of the main injection, late intake valve closing, intake throttling and elevated idle speed can substantially increase the available exhaust gas enthalpy and temperature at the expense of additional fuel as has been shown in the literature. On the other hand, the exhaust system can be optimized in terms of hardware and controls, which is nowadays strongly supported by simulation. However, these simulation studies typically assume a fixed engine hardware and calibration and thus fixed engine-out simulation boundary conditions. Moving forward to tougher and real-world oriented legislation, the fixed cycle and engine-out boundary condition becomes insufficient.