Search Results

The use of Ducted Fuel Injection (DFI) for attenuating soot formation throughout mixing-controlled diesel combustion has been demonstrated impressively effective both experimentally and numerically. However, the last research studies have highlighted the need for tailored engine calibration and duct geometry optimization for the full exploitation of the technology potential. Nevertheless, the research gap on the response of DFI combustion to the main engine operating parameters has still to be fully covered. Previous research analysis has been focused on numerical soot-targeted duct geometry optimization in constant-volume vessel conditions. Starting from the optimized duct design, the herein study aims to analyze the influence of several engine operating parameters (i.e. rail pressure, air density, oxygen concentration) on DFI combustion, having free spray results as a reference.

In recent years, the automotive industry has been increasingly committed to developing new solutions for better and more efficient engines. One of them is the use of new insulating materials (thermal conductivity < 0.4 W/m-K, heat capacitance < 500 kJ/m3-K) to coat the engine combustion chamber walls, as well as the exhaust manifold. The main idea when coating the combustion chamber with these materials is to obtain a reduction of the temperature difference (thermal swing) between gas and walls during the engine cycle and minimize heat losses. Experimental measurements of the possible performance improvements are very difficult to obtain, mainly because the techniques available to measure wall temperature are limited. Therefore, simulations are typically used to investigate insulated combustion chambers. Nevertheless, the new generation of insulating coatings is posing challenges to numerical modelling, as layer thickness is very small (~100 μm).

The current electrification trend involving hybrid and electric vehicles requires accurate tools to evaluate performance and reliability of electric powertrains’ control systems. Thanks to Hardware in the Loop (HiL) technique, verification, validation and virtual calibration of Electronic Control Systems can be performed without physical plants, addressing the need of frontloading, cost and time reduction of new vehicles control systems development. However, HiL applications with power electronics controllers brings several concerns due to the extremely low timestep needed for accurate simulation of electromagnetic phenomena, making FPGA-based simulation the only option. Moreover, thermal aspects of electric motors are very important from the control perspective as complex thermal management control strategies are implemented to improve the efficiency and to prevent overheating that can cause permanent damage to the electrical machine.

A comprehensive experimental and numerical analysis of two state-of-the-art diesel AfterTreatment Systems (ATS) for automotive applications is presented in this work. Both systems, designed to fulfill Euro 6 emissions regulations standards, consist of a closed-coupled Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC) followed by a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) catalyst coated on a Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF), also known as SCR on Filter (SCRoF or SCRF). While the two systems feature the same Urea Water Solution (UWS) injector, major differences could be observed in the UWS mixing device, which is placed upstream of the SCRoF, whose design represents a crucial challenge due to the severe flow uniformity and compact packaging requirements.

Compression ignition engine-based transportation is nowadays looking for cleaner combustion solutions. Among them, ducted fuel injection (DFI) is emerging as a cutting-edge technology due to its potential to drastically curtail engine-out soot emissions. Although the DFI capability to abate soot formation has been demonstrated both in constant-volume and optical engine conditions, its optimization and understanding is still needed for its exploitation on series production engines. For this purpose, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) coupled with low-cost turbulence models, like RANS, can be a powerful tool, especially in the industrial context. However, it is often challenging to obtain reliable RANS-based CFD simulations, especially due to the high dependence of the various state-of-the-art turbulence models on the case study.