Search Results

Vehicle floor vibration is the resultant of different road inputs damped through various transfer paths. Seat comfort, which depends on these floor vibrations, can be evaluated with a single input signal “Pink noise”; which constitutes various road inputs. Transmissibility of seat structure on a vibration shaker with pink noise input includes all possible responses of road inputs. Still, transmissibility profile at vehicle end and component level varies. This is due to the utilization of “dummy” on component level testing on vibration shaker, which acts as a dead weight with dissimilar damping characteristics of human. A transmissibility correlation between human and dummy is attained by replacing the dummy in place of human and actuating it to find the difference in contribution between them for different class of vehicles. This contribution extrapolation from the damping effects of human and dummy is applied on dummy transmissibility.

Traditionally, vehicle ride and comfort is evaluated, subjectively as well as objectively. Based on the outcome of subjective and objective tests, it is refined by optimizing primary suspension system, secondary suspension system, seating system, rubber bushings, frame and BIW for mass, stiffness, damping, geometry etc. Many a time subjective assessment results stands in contradiction to the objective assessment results; emphasizing need for having good correlation between subjective and objective test results. In such cases, it is ambiguous to decide suitable design refinement action and can lead to no improvement situation. Hence, it is essential to have concurring test procedures for subjective and objective ride evaluation. This paper describes a novel methodology to address the above said challenge. There are defined set of test events and measurement data points to be used in subjective and objective testing.