Search Results

It is very significant for autonomous vehicles to have the ability to operate beyond the stable handling limits, which plays a vital role in vehicles’ active safety and enhances riding and driving pleasure. For traditional vehicles, it is rather difficult to control the longitudinal speed, sideslip angle and yaw rate simultaneously when drifting along a given trajectory because they are under-actuated. Nevertheless, for a 4-wheel-independent-drive (4WID) vehicle, it is possible and controllable thanks to its over-actuated characteristics. This article designs a trajectory following control strategy for automated drifting of 4WID vehicles. First, a double-track 7 degree of freedom (7DOF) vehicle dynamic model is established, which incorporates longitudinal and lateral load transfer and considers nonlinear tire models. The controller which proposes a hierarchical architecture is then designed.

To further explore the potential of fuel economy for hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), a methodology of demand power optimization is proposed. The fuel consumption depends not only on the EMS, but also on the way to operate vehicle. A control strategy to adjust driver’s demand before power splitting is necessary. To get accurate and reliable control strategy, two aspects are the most important. First, a rigorous and organized modeling approach is a base to describe complicated powertrain system of HEV. The energetic macroscopic representation (EMR) is a graphical synthetic description of electromechanical conversion system based on energy flow. A powertrain architecture of HEV is described explicitly via the EMR. Second, the effectiveness of EMS and the reasonability of driving operations are vital.

To tackle the over-actuated and highly nonlinear characteristics that four-wheel-independent-steering and four-wheel-independent -driving (4WIS/4WID) vehicles exhibit when tracking aggressive trajectory, a hierarchical controller with layers of computation-intensive modules is commonly adopted. The high-level linear motion controller commands the desired state derivatives of the vehicle to meet the overall trajectory tracking objectives. Then the system dynamic is inversed by the mid-level control allocation layer and the low-level wheel control layer to map the target state derivatives to steering angle and motor torque commands. However, this type of controller is difficult to implement on the embedded hardware onboard since the nonlinear dynamic inversion is typically solved by nonlinear programming.