Search Results

A more accurate combustion model, based on Fluent simulations including the effect of flame stretching and extinction, has been added to cycle and road simulations of an Adaptive Cycle Engine (ACE), where compressions and expansions do not follow a predefined sequence. Also, engine speed data from the Argonne Downloadable Dynamometer Database is used in the road simulations in lieu of the original constant-speed model. Results show a drop in predicted steady-state brake efficiency and bmep around 15% relative to the model using a standard Wiebe function for heat release rate. Performance on road cycles is not greatly affected by the delayed combustion since the relationship between expansion mass and work is largely unchanged. Even with the refined model, future ACE-equipped vehicles are expected to be competitive with electric powertrains in pre-tax cost and overall emissions.

Adaptive Cycle Engines, where compression and expansion events do not follow a fixed sequence but rather take place depending on demand, are competitive against electric motors because of their higher power density, lower carbon footprint with current energy sources, and predicted ability to use any kind of renewable fuel. The advantage of Adaptive Cycle Engines is greater whenever the powerplant has at least two distinct operating modes: one for high output, and one for high energy economy. This paper compares the well-to-wheels CO2 emissions and pre-tax costs when operating powerplants based on Adaptive Cycle Engines and on electric motors under several scenarios: passenger car, on-road heavy-duty vehicle, and light aircraft.