Search Results

The growing presence of Spark Ignition Direct Injection (SIDI) engines along with the prevalence of direct injected Compression Ignition (CI) engines results in the requirement of Particulate Matter (PM) exhaust abatement. This occurs through the implementation of Gasoline Particulate Filters (GPFs) and Diesel Particulate Filters (DPFs). Modeling of GPFs and DPFs are analogous because of the similar flow patterns and wall flow PM capture methodology. Conventional modeling techniques include a two-channel (inlet/outlet) formulation that is applicable up to three-dimensions. However, the numerical stiffness that results from the need to couple the solution of these channels in compressible flow can result in relatively long run times. Previously, the author presented a lumped DPF model using dynamically incompressible flow intended for an Engine Control Unit (ECU) in order to generate a model that runs faster than real time using a high-level programming language.

Particulate filters (PF) are a highly effective after-treatment device that reduces particulate matter emissions, a rising environmental concern in the automotive industry. However, accumulation of solid particles during the PF filtration process increases engine backpressure considerably, which can have a negative impact on engine efficiency, acoustics, and gaseous emissions. In this area, an accurate pressure drop model helps to better understand the effect of accumulated solid particles in the PF on engine backpressure, aiding in design and regeneration considerations without physical testing. These effects are further improved on board the vehicle using a single equation pressure drop model with a relatively low computational cost. This article presents a thorough history of PF pressure drop models and their advancements.

Diesel Particulate Filters (DPFs) have become a required aftertreatment device for Compression Ignition engine exhaust cleanup of Particulate Matter (PM). Moreover, with the increased prevalence of Spark Ignition Direct Injection (SIDI) systems, discussions are currently underway regarding the need of Gasoline Particulate Filters to handle the PM emanating from their combustion process. In this area, the two-channel DPF model has been widely successful in predicting the temperature, pressure drop, and species conversion in these devices. Because of the need to simulate compressible flow through the channels and a porous wall, these models have a difficult time achieving real-time predictive results suitable for an Engine Control Unit (ECU). As a result, this effort describes the creation of a lumped DPF model intended for an ECU. Model formulation was based on the standard governing equations, but simplified in order to remove as much computational overhead as possible.

Significant progress towards reducing diesel engine fuel consumption and emissions is possible through the simultaneous Waste Heat Recovery (WHR) and Particulate Matter (PM) filtration in a novel device described here as a Diesel Particulate Filter Heat Exchanger (DPFHX). This original device concept is based on the shell-and-tube heat exchanger geometry, where enlarged tubes contain DPF cores, allowing waste heat recovery from engine exhaust and allowing further energy capture from the exothermic PM regeneration event. The heat transferred to the working fluid on the shell side of the DPFHX becomes available for use in a secondary power cycle, which is an increasingly attractive method of boosting powertrain efficiency due to fuel savings of around 10 to 15%. Moreover, these fuel savings are proportional to the associated emissions reduction after a short warm-up period, with startup emissions relatively unchanged when implementing a WHR system.