Search Results

This work details the process employed to design the 2009 Cooper Union FSAE® suspension system, spanning the overarching design philosophy, configuration selection, analysis, fabrication, and implementation, while offering recommendations to those especially new to the field. The design methodology illustrated here provides a systematic approach to suspension geometry, material selection, packaging, and construction. Though this paper serves as a starting point for FSAE® suspension designers, it provides a succinct overview for those interested in general suspension design fundamentals. The design process began with the selection of a suspension configuration, geometries, and kinematics, which were driven in part by tire data, desired bulk vehicle dynamics characteristics, and overall geometric variability. The springs and adjustable dampers were then selected as the front and rear anti-roll bar properties were concurrently designed.

A low-cost, high precision strain gauge data acquisition system was designed and implemented to aid in optimizing the design of suspension and steering members in an FSAE vehicle. The primary focus of the project was to capture load limits in A-arms, steering tie-rods, and toe control linkages and to extract the dynamic response of the suspension system when subjected to steady-state cornering and bump scenarios. These data are critical considerations needed to systematically and aggressively address suspension material selection and fabrication, vehicle dynamic response, and weight savings. In addition, the data from this system were intended to enhance the accuracy of imposed FEA boundary conditions, corroborate on-road system responses to simulated data, and provide a cost-effective, wireless alternative for a wide range of low-level electrical signals throughout the vehicle.

The target cascading methodology is applied to the conceptual design of an advanced heavy tactical truck. Two levels are defined: an integrated truck model is represented at the top (vehicle) level and four independent suspension arms are represented at the lower (system) level. Necessary analysis models are developed, and design problems are formulated and solved iteratively at both levels. Hence, vehicle design variables and system specifications are determined in a consistent manner. Two different target sets and two different propulsion systems are considered. Trade-offs between conflicting targets are identified. It is demonstrated that target cascading can be useful in avoiding costly design iterations late in the product development process.