Search Results

Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computations of heat transfer involving wall bounded flows at elevated Prandtl numbers typically suffer from a lack of accuracy and/or increased mesh dependency. This can be often attributed to an improper near-wall turbulence modeling and the deficiency of the wall heat transfer models (based on the so called P-functions) that do not properly account for the variation of the turbulent Prandtl number in the wall proximity (y+< 5). As the conductive sub-layer gets significantly thinner than the viscous velocity sub-layer (for Pr >1), treatment of the thermal buffer layer gains importance as well. Various hybrid strategies utilize blending functions dependent on the molecular Prandtl number, which do not necessarily provide a smooth transition from the viscous/conductive sub-layer to the logarithmic region.

This paper presents calculations of external car aerodynamics by using the finite volume (FV) immersed-boundary method. The FV numerical codes primarily employ Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models. In recent years, and due to possibility to run very large computational meshes, these models are usually used in conjunction with the advanced near-wall models. Moreover, it has been often demonstrated that the accuracy of RANS near-wall models relies on the mesh quality near the wall so by the rule, larger number of wall body-fitted cell-layers are employed. An immersed boundary (IB) method becomes an attractive alternative to the ‘standard’ FV approaches especially when applied to low quality CAD data. In general, the IB method is less investigated and validated for the car aerodynamics, particularly in conjunction with advanced near-wall turbulence models and an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR).