Search Results

Six laboratories capable of chassis-testing heavy-duty vehicles participated in a crosscheck program designed to compare emissions results from a Ford L-9000. The single-axle vehicle was shipped to each laboratory and tested through a series of UDDS and steady-state cycles. The resulting data were compared statistically using reproducibility and repeatability analyses. Although one lab produced some results that significantly differed from the other five, the remaining labs produced comparable results. TPM, CO and THC were the most variable while NOX and CO2 were most stable. Lab differences included atmospheric and environmental conditions, road-load curve application and drivers. Comparison of steady state and transient tests suggest that driver variability is not a major factor.

Heavy duty diesel vehicle (HDDV) emissions are known to affect air quality, but few studies have quantified the real-world contribution to the inventory. The objective of this study was to provide data that may enable ambient emissions investigators to m,odel the air quality more accurately. The 25 vehicles reported in this paper are from the first phase of a program to determine representative regulated emissions from Heavy Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks (HHDDT) operating in Southern California. Emissions data were gathered using a chassis dynamometer, full flow dilution tunnel, and research grade analyzers. The subject program employed two truck test weights and four new test modes (one was idle operation), in addition to the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS), and the AC50/80 cycle. The reason for such a broad test cycle scope was to determine thoroughly how HHDDT emissions are influenced by operating cycle to improve accuracy of models.