Search Results

Many approaches have been taken to determine the burning velocity in internal combustion engines. Experimentally, the burning velocity has been determined in optically accessible gasoline engines by tracking the propagation of the flame front from the spark plug to the end of the combustion chamber. These experiments are costly as they require special imaging techniques and major modifications in the engine structure. Another approach to determine the burning velocity is from 3D CFD simulation models. These models require basic information about the mechanisms of combustion which are not available for distillate fuels in addition to many assumptions that have to be made to determine the burning velocity. Such models take long periods of computational time for execution and have to be calibrated and validated through experimentation.

This study investigates the effects of octane quality on the performance, i.e., acceleration and power, and fuel economy (FE) of one late model US vehicle, which is powered by a small displacement, turbocharged, gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine. The relative importance of the gasoline parameters Research and Motor Octane Number (RON and MON) in meeting the octane requirement of this engine to run at an optimum spark timing for the given demand was considered by evaluating the octane index (OI), where OI = (1-K) RON + K MON and K is a constant depending on engine design and operating conditions. Over wide open throttle (WOT) accelerations, the average K of this Pontiac Solstice was determined as −0.75, whereby a lower MON would give a higher OI, a higher knock resistance and better performance.

Three-dimensional transient numerical simulations are conducted to study the oil flow in a four-cylinder internal-combustion engine while it operates without its oil filler cap on. The emphasis of the study is on analyzing the consequential oil ejection through the oil-cap open boundary. Navier-Stokes equations are solved together with the multiphase Volume of Fluid (VOF) model and the k-ϵ turbulence model. The engine crank shaft is mechanically connected to two cam shafts through a chain, which operates below the oil-filler duct. A baffle is located between the chain and the duct, shielding the latter to minimize oil ejection and potential spills. The chain geometry and dynamics are captured accurately through volume remesh and conformal mapping techniques. The motion of the four pistons, crank shaft, and two cam shafts is also considered. Retaining all these mechanical and geometrical details in the simulations is essential to obtain accurate oil ejection results.