Search Results

Brake system development and testing is spread over vehicle manufacturers, system and component suppliers. Test equipment from different sources, even resulting from different technology generations, different data analysis and report tools - comprising different and sometimes undocumented algorithms - lead to a difficult exchange and analysis of test results and, at the same time, contributes to unwanted test variability. Other studies regarding the test variability brought up that only a unified and unambiguous data format will allow a meaningful and comparative evaluation of these data and only standardization will reveal the actual reasons of test variability. The text at hand illustrates that a substantial part of test variability is caused by a misinterpretation of data and/or by the application of different algorithms.

Vibration analysis of squealing brake systems under actual running conditions is a common tool for getting familiar to deflection shapes and to give straight forward hints, where and how a given system of brake and chassis might be sensitive to design evolutions. These experimental approaches -typically using accelerometers, laser-interferometry or the like- give detailed information about vibrational behavior of the structure. In contrast to this, an acoustical method as the so-called „acoustic camera” gives additional information by detecting noise sources. As can be seen from comparisons of vibrational and acoustical methods, there is not a simple connection between structure deflection and actual emission of noise. Examples are shown, what the acoustical method gives as extra information and where its limitations are. Additional benefit is expected from artificial excitation rather than running conditions, which is discussed.