Search Results

Exterior component integration presents competing performance challenges for balanced exterior styling, safety, ‘structural feel’ [1] and durability. Industry standard practices utilize noise and vibration mode maps and source-path-receiver [2] considerations for component mode frequency placement. This modal frequency placement has an influence on ‘structural feel’ and durability performance. Challenges have increased with additional styling content, geometric overhang from attachment points, component size and mass, and sensor modules. Base excitation at component attachment interfaces are increase due to relative positioning of the suspension and propulsion vehicle source inputs. These components might include headlamps, side mirrors, end gates, bumpers and fascia assemblies. Here, we establish basic expectations for the behavior of these systems, and ultimately consolidate existing rationales that are applied to these systems.

Accelerating product development cycles and incentives to reduce costs in product development are strong motivators to move to virtual development and validation processes. Challenges to moving to a virtual paradigm include a wealth of historical data and context for hardware tests, uncertainty over dependencies, and a lack of a clear path of transition to virtual methods. In this paper we will discuss approaches to understanding the value created by hardware tests and aligning that value to virtual processes. We will also discuss the need for a virtual context to be added to SAE J1739 [1] (DFMEA detection criteria), and how to create paths to maximize the value of virtual assessments. Finally, we will also discuss the cultural and organizational changes required to support.

As passenger vehicle design evolves and accelerates, the use of multi-body dynamics solvers has proven to be invaluable in the engineering workflow. MBD solvers allow engineers to build virtual vehicle models that can accurately simulate vehicle responses and calculate internal forces, which previously could only be assessed using physical prototype builds with hundreds of measurement transducers. Evaluation and selection of solvers within an engineering environment is inherently a multi-dimensional activity that can include ease of use, retention of previously developed expertise, accuracy, speed, and integration with existing analysis processes. We discuss here some of the challenges present in developing capability and accumulating data to support each of these criteria. Developing a pilot model that is capable of being applied to a comprehensive set of use cases, and then verifying those use cases, required significant project management activity.