Search Results

Water injection (WI) can improve gasoline engine performance and efficiency, and on-board water recovery technology could eliminate the need for customers to refill an on-board water reservoir. In this regard, the technical feasibility of exhaust water recovery (EWR) is described in this paper. Water injection testing was conducted at a full load condition (5000 rpm/18.1 bar BMEP) and a high load condition (3000 rpm/14.0 bar BMEP) on a turbocharged gasoline direction injection (GTDI) engine. Water recovery testing was conducted both after the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) cooler and after the charge air cooler (CAC) at a high load (3000 rpm/14.0 bar BMEP), as well as a part load (2080 rpm/6.8 bar BMEP) condition, at temperatures ca. 10-15 °C below the dew point of the flow stream. Three types of water separation designs were tested: a passive cyclone separator (CS), a passive membrane separator (MEM), and an active separator (AS).

Because of the thermodynamic relationship of pressure, temperature and volume for processes which occur in an internal-combustion engine (ICE), and their relationship to ideal efficiency and efficiency-limiting phenomena e.g. knock in spark-ignition engines, changing the thermo-chemical properties of the in-cylinder charge should be considered as an increment in the development of the ICE engine for future efficiency improvements. Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) in spark-ignited gasoline engines is one increment that has been made to alter the in-cylinder charge. EGR gives proven thermal efficiency benefits for SI engines which improve vehicle fuel economy, as demonstrated through literature and production applications. The thermal efficiency benefit of EGR is due to lower in-cylinder temperatures, reduced heat transfer and reduced pumping losses. The next major increment could be modifying the constituents of the EGR stream, potentially through the means of a membrane.