Search Results

A detailed thermodynamic analysis was performed to demonstrate the fundamental efficiency advantage of an opposed-piston two-stroke engine over a standard four-stroke engine. Three engine configurations were considered: a baseline six-cylinder four-stroke engine, a hypothetical three-cylinder opposed-piston four-stroke engine, and a three-cylinder opposed-piston two-stroke engine. The bore and stroke per piston were held constant for all engine configurations to minimize any potential differences in friction. The closed-cycle performance of the engine configurations were compared using a custom analysis tool that allowed the sources of thermal efficiency differences to be identified and quantified.

High frame rate particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements were performed in a motored engine at speeds of 600 and 1200 rpm under both throttled and unthrottled conditions. Data were acquired at 1 kHz throughout the entire engine cycle, allowing the temporal and spatial evolution of the flow to be observed. The data were both temporally and spatially filtered to study the turbulent flowfield. The mean (over the spatial domain) kinetic energy of the high-pass filtered data, and its evolution with cutoff frequency or length, was used to quantitatively compare differences between operating conditions and different cycles at the same condition. The difference in fluctuation kinetic energy, when normalized, between different operating conditions was found to be comparable to the difference between cycles. A comparison between spatially and temporally filtered data at the same level of fluctuation kinetic energy was performed.