Search Results

Despite an overall trend towards harmonization in vehicle regulations, regional differences persist in the area of exhaust emissions and fuel economy. The test procedure employed can exert a significant impact on the results obtained. In this paper, the EU and US type approval procedures for light duty vehicles are briefly compared and results obtained from several types of test procedure are presented. Specifically, emissions tests were performed on a single SUV which met US Tier III emissions limits. The vehicle featured a conventional, naturally aspirated spark ignition engine with indirect fuel injection and an aftertreatment system consisting of three-way catalysts with no dedicated particulate filtration device. The vehicle’s engine displacement, total mass and power-to-mass ratio were relatively representative of the upper end of the US market, but represented an outlying vehicle in terms of the characteristics of the EU fleet.

Exhaust gas aftertreatment systems can, under certain conditions, create undesired chemical species as a result of their elimination reactions. A prime example of this is ammonia (NH3), which is not formed in the combustion reaction, but which can be formed within a three-way catalyst (TWC) when physicochemical conditions permit. The elimination of NOx in the TWC thus sometimes comes at the cost of significant emissions of NH3. Ammonia is a pollutant and a reactive nitrogen compound (RNC) and NH3 emissions should be analyzed in this context, alongside other RNC species. Examination of the literature on the subject published over the past two decades shows that ammonia, a species which is currently not subject to systematic emissions requirements for road vehicles in any market, is often identified as forming the majority of the RNC emissions under a range of operating conditions.