Search Results

Integrated modeling of vehicle, tire and terrain is a fundamental challenge to be addressed for off-road autonomous navigation. The complexities arise due to lack of tools and techniques to predict the continuously varying terrain and environmental conditions and the resultant non-linearities. The solution to this challenge can now be found in the plethora of data driven modeling and control techniques that have gained traction in the last decade. Data driven modeling and control techniques rely on the system’s repeated interaction with the environment to generate a lot of data and then use a function approximator to fit a model for the physical system with the data. Getting good quality and quantity of data may involve extensive experimentation with the physical system impacting developer’s resource. The process is computationally expensive, and the overhead time required is high.

Recent trends in autonomy have emphasized end-to-end deep-learning-based methods that have shown a lot of promise in overcoming the requirements and limitations of feature-engineering. However, while promising, the black-box nature of deep-learning frameworks now exacerbates the need for testing with end-to-end deployments. Further, as exemplars of systems-of-systems, autonomous vehicles (AVs) engender numerous interconnected component-, subsystem and system-level interactions. The ensuing complexity creates challenges for verification and validation at the various component, subsystem- and system-levels as well as end-to-end testing. While simulation-based testing is one promising avenue, oftentimes the lack of adequate fidelity of AV and environmental modeling limits the generalizability. In contrast, full-scale AV testing presents the usual limitations of time-, space-, and cost.

Range anxiety and lack of adequate access to fast charging are proving to be important impediments to electric vehicle (EV) adoption. While many techniques to fast charging EV batteries (model-based & model-free) have been developed, they have focused on a single Lithium-ion cell. Extensions to battery packs are scarce, often considering simplified architectures (e.g., series-connected) for ease of modeling. Computational considerations have also restricted fast-charging simulations to small battery packs, e.g., four cells (for both series and parallel connected cells). Hence, in this paper, we pursue a model-free approach based on reinforcement learning (RL) to fast charge a large battery pack (comprising 444 cells). Each cell is characterized by an equivalent circuit model coupled with a second-order lumped thermal model to simulate the battery behavior. After training the underlying RL, the developed model will be straightforward to implement with low computational complexity.

Artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced control system deployments are emerging as a viable substitute to more traditional control system. In particular, deep learning techniques offer an alternate approach to tune the ever increasing sets of control system parameters to extract performance. However, the systematic verification and validation (to establish the reliability and robustness) of deep learning based controllers in actual deployments remains a challenge. This is exacerbated by the need to evaluate and optimize control systems embedded within an operational environment (with its own sets of additional unknown or uncertain parameters). Existing literature comparisons of deep learning against traditional controllers, where they may exist, do not offer structured approaches to comparative performance evaluation and improvement. It is also crucial to develop a standardized controlled test environment within which various controllers are evaluated against a common metric.

Modeling uncertainties pose a significant challenge in the development and deployment of model-based vehicle control systems. Most model- based automotive control systems require the use of a well estimated vehicle dynamics prediction model. The ability of first principles-based models to represent vehicle behavior becomes limited under complex scenarios due to underlying rigid physical assumptions. Additionally, the increasing complexity of these models to meet ever-increasing fidelity requirements presents challenges for obtaining analytical solutions as well as control design. Alternatively, deterministic data driven techniques including but not limited to deep neural networks, polynomial regression, Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy) have been deployed for vehicle dynamics system identification and prediction.