Search Results

The CDIF Family of Standards is primarily designed to be used as a description of a mechanism for transferring information between CASE tools. It facilitates a successful transfer when the authors of the importing and exporting tools have nothing in common except an agreement to conform to CDIF. The language that is defined for the Transfer Format also has applicability as a general language for Import/Export from repositories. The CDIF Integrated Meta-model defined for CASE also has applicability as the basis of standard definitions for use in repositories. The standards that form the complete family of CDIF Standards are documented in EIA/IS-106 CDIF - CASE Data Interchange Format - Overview. These standards cover the overall framework, the transfer format and the CDIF Integrated Meta-model. The diagram in Figure 1 depicts the various standards that comprise the CDIF Family of Standards. The shaded box depicts this Standard and its position in the CDIF Family of Standards.

This Aerospace Standard is to be used as a supplement to SAE AS7114. In addition to the requirements contained in AS7114, the requirements contained herein shall apply to suppliers seeking NADCAP accreditation for Magnetic Particle Inspection. When customer requirements differ from those specified herein, the customer requirements shall take precedence.

This International Standard establishes a common framework for software life cycle processes, with well-defined terminology, that can be referenced by the software industry. It contains processes, activities, and tasks that are to be applied during the acquisition of a system that contains software, a stand-alone software product, and software service and during the supply, development, operation, and maintenance of software products. Software includes the software portion of firmware. This International Standard also provides a process that can be employed for defining, controlling, and improving software life cycle processes.

This guide provides implementation consideration guidance for the normative clauses of IEEE/EIA 12207.0. The guidance is based on software industry experience with the life cycle processes presented in IEEE/EIA 12207.0.

Several new technologies are now emerging to improve adhesive supply and formulation along with surface treatments that have the potential to offer significant improvements to both surface energy and cleanliness [3]. Additionally, the miniaturisation of laboratory techniques into portable equipment offers potential for online surface energy and chemical analysis measurement for use as quality control measures in a production environment. An overview of newly available technology is given here with several devices studied in further detail. Technologies assessed further in this paper are; portable surface contact angle measurement, ambient pressure plasma cleaning, portable FTIR measurement and adhesive mixing equipment. A number of potential applications are outlined for each device based on the operational technique. The practical aspects of implementation and the perceived technology readiness levels for operation, implementation and results are also given.

Statistical process control (SPC) has been extensively used in many different industries including automotive, electronics, and aerospace, among others. SPC tools such as control charts, process capability analysis, sampling inspection, etc., have definitive and powerful impact on quality control and improvement for mass production and similar production systems. In aerospace manufacturing, however, applications of SPC tools are more challenging, especially when these tools are implemented in processes producing products of large sizes with slower production rates. For instance, following a widely accepted rule-of-thumb, about 100 units of products are required in the first phase of implementing a Shewhart type control chart. Once established, it then can be used for process control in the second phase for actual production process monitoring and control.

This Aerospace Standard (AS) is to be used to supplement AS7110. In addition to the requirements contained in AS7110, the requirements contained herein shall apply to suppliers seeking NADCAP accreditation for percussion stud welding.

This document was developed by the SAE AS-1B5 CLARA Task Group to explain and document background information and decisions with associated rationale made in development of the CLARA Interface Control Document (ICD), AIR5682. This rationale document is published separately to preserve information that is not required or provided in the ICD but may be important to users.

This document was developed by the SAE AS-1B5 CLARA Task Group to explain and document background information and decisions with associated rationale made in development of the CLARA Interface Control Document (ICD), AIR5682. This rationale document is published separately to preserve information that is not required or provided in the ICD but may be important to users.

This specification covers a corrosion and heat-resistant steel in the form of sand or centrifugal castings.

This specification covers a corrosion and heat resistant nickel alloy in the form of sand castings.

This specification covers a corrosion and heat resistant nickel alloy in the form of sand castings.

This specification covers a corrosion and heat resistant nickel alloy in the form of sand castings.

This specification and its associated detail specifications cover phosphonitrilic fluoroelastomers (FZ) in the form of molded rings.

This specification and its associated detail specifications cover phosphonitrilic fluoroelastomers (FZ) in the form of molded rings.

This specification covers a magnesium alloy in the form of sand castings.