Search Results

The vehicle dynamics of non-collinear, low-velocity front-to- rear collisions have received little formal study. The twenty-three angled collisions conducted for this project revealed significant vehicle dynamic differences when compared with similar-energy collinear rear-end collisions. Two recent model year vehicles were used to conduct non-collinear collisions at a nominal 12 km/h impact velocity. The pre-collision angles between the test vehicles were established so that the striking vehicle's line of action through its CG was either 15 or 30 degrees from the stationary struck vehicle's initial heading. Both vehicles had accelerometers at their CG's measuring longitudinal and lateral accelerations. The struck vehicle also had sensors to measure CG vertical accelerations, yaw rates, and longitudinal and lateral velocities. Film from three high-speed 16-mm [film] cameras was digitized and analyzed for each collision. The ΔV at various points within the struck vehicle was studied.

Calculating head accelerations and neck loading is essential for understanding and predicting head and neck injury. Most of the desired information cannot be directly measured in experiments with human volunteers. Achieving accurate results after applying the necessary transformations from remote measurements is difficult, particularly in the case of a head impact. The objective of this study was to develop a methodology for accurately calculating the accelerations at the center of gravity of the head and the loads and moments at the occipital condyles. To validate this methodology in a challenging test condition, twenty (20) human volunteers and a Hybrid III dummy were subjected to forehead impacts from a soccer ball traveling horizontally at speeds up to 11.5 m/s. The human subjects and the Hybrid III were instrumented with linear accelerometers and an angular rate sensor inside the mouth.

In rollover accidents, physical evidence of seat belt usage is occasionally difficult to discern. Typically, if a seat belt is used by an occupant in an accident, various seat belt components will display characteristic marks in well-defined locations. These marks are known as “witness marks” or “occupant load marks.” Witness marks in a rollover accident may be faint in comparison to those caused by the occupant restraint forces in high-energy planar collisions. Additionally, in situations where a seat belt buckle is alleged to have unlatched early in a rollover accident, the lack of clear occupant load marks may in some cases be attributed to an alleged “buckle release” that occurred very early in the rollover sequence, so that the seat belt did not sustain loading while in a latched condition.

Rollover crash and accident studies identify significant roof-to-ground impacts adjacent to the vehicle occupant as a potential cause of severe injuries. It is not possible with existing dynamic rollover test methods to specifically repeat or recreate a particular roof-to-ground impact in a controlled fashion. Variations associated with tire-to-dolly, tire/wheel-to-ground, and vehicle-to-ground interactions early in current rollover test methods tend to produce unpredictable and unrepeatable roof-to-ground impacts later in the test. A new test device now enables researchers to bypass the uncertainty of these first ground interactions by beginning each test with the desired roof-to-ground impact conditions as a test input. The new rollover test method releases a rotating vehicle onto the ground from the back of a moving semi-trailer.

The results of a number of previous studies have demonstrated that seat-belted occupants can undergo significant upward and outward excursion during the airborne phase of vehicular rollover, which may place the occupant at risk for injury during subsequent ground contacts. Furthermore, testing using human volunteers, ATDs, and cadavers has shown that increasing tension in the restraint system prior to a rollover event may be of value for reducing occupant displacement. On this basis, it may be argued that pretensioning the restraint system, utilizing technology developed and installed primarily for improving injury outcome in frontal impacts, may modify restrained occupant injury potential during rollover accidents. However, the capacity of current pretensioner designs to positively impact the motion of a restrained occupant during rollover remains unclear.

Three rollcaged and three production roof vehicles were exposed to matched-pair rollover impacts using the Controlled Rollover Impact System (CRIS). The roof-to-ground contacts were representative of severe impacts in previous rollover testing and real world rollovers. The seat belted dummies measured nearly identical head impacts and neck loads with or without the rollcage, despite significant roof crush in the production roof vehicles. Roof crush had no measurable influence on the severity of the head accelerations and neck loads.

Anthropomorphic test dummies (ATDs) have been validated for the analysis of various types of automobile collisions through pendulum, impact, and sled testing. However, analysis of the fidelity of ATDs in rollover collisions has focused primarily on the behavior of the ATD head and neck in axial compression. Only limited work has been performed to evaluate the behavior of different surrogate models for the analysis of occupant motion during rollover. Recently, Moffatt et al. examined head excursions for near- and far-side occupants using a laboratory-based rollover fixture, which rotated the vehicle about a fixed, longitudinal axis. The responses of both Hybrid III ATD and human volunteers were measured. These experimental datasets were used in the present study to evaluate MADYMO ATD and human facet computational models of occupant motion during the airborne phase of rollover.

Vehicle occupants undergo upward and outward excursion during the airborne phase of vehicle rollover due to the inertial effects coming from the vehicle's rotation. When this excursion is sufficient to permit contact between the occupant's head and the vehicle's interior roof panel, the neck may experience compressive loading. This compressive loading, generated during the airborne phase and prior to vehicle-to-ground impact, could render the occupant more susceptible to compressive neck injury during subsequent vehicle-to-ground impacts. In the present study, computational simulations were used to evaluate the effect of steady-state roll rate on compressive preloading in the cervical spine. The results show an increasing relationship between roll rate and compressive preloading when the head contacts the roof panel and becomes constrained.

Previous literature has shown that serious neck injury can occur during rollover events, even for restrained occupants, when the occupant's head contacts the vehicle interior during a roof-to-ground impact or contacts the ground directly through an adjacent window opening. Confusion about the mechanism of these injuries can result when the event is viewed from an accelerated reference frame such as an onboard camera. Researchers generally agree that the neck is stressed as a result of relative motion between head and torso but disagree as to the origin of the neck loading. This paper reviews the principles underlying the analysis of rollover impacts to establish a physical basis for understanding the source of disagreement and demonstrates the usefulness of physical testing to illustrate occupant impact dynamics. A series of rollover impacts has been performed using the Controlled Rollover Impact System (CRIS) with both production vehicles and vehicles with modified roof structures.

Vehicle dynamics in sideswipe collisions are markedly different from other types of collisions. Sideswipe collisions are characterized by prolonged sliding contact, often with very little structural deformation. An analytical model was developed to investigate the vehicle dynamics of sideswipe collisions. The vehicles were modeled as rigid bodies, and lateral interaction between the vehicles was modeled with a linear elastic spring. This linear spring was meant to represent the combined lateral stiffness of both vehicles before significant crush develops. Longitudinal interaction between the vehicles was modeled as frictional contact. In order to validate the model, seven (7) low speed (3 - 10 kph), shallow angle (15°) sideswipe collisions were staged with instrumented vehicles. These sideswipe collisions were characterized by long contact durations (∼ 1 s) and low accelerations (< 0.4 g's). The experimental collisions were also simulated with EDSMAC.

While previous studies have recognized and demonstrated the upward and outward occupant motion that occurs during the airborne phase of rollover and estimated the resulting head excursion using static and dynamic approaches, the effect of roll rate on restrained occupant head excursion has not been comprehensively evaluated. Moffatt and colleagues recently examined head excursions for near- and far-side occupants resulting from steady-state roll velocities using a laboratory fixture and both Hybrid III anthropomorphic test dummies (ATD) and human volunteers. To expand upon that study, a MADYMO computational model of a rolling airborne vehicle was developed to more thoroughly evaluate the effects of roll rate on occupant kinematics and head excursion. The interior structure of the vehicle used by Moffatt et al. was modeled, and the ATD kinematics observed in that experimental study were used to validate the computational models of the current study.