Search Results

Biodiesel is a promising alternative to traditional diesel fuel due to its similar combustion properties to diesel and lower carbon emissions on a well-to-wheel basis. However, combusting biodiesel still generates hydrocarbon (HC), CO, NOx and particulate matter (PM) emissions, similar to those from traditional diesel fuel usage. Therefore, aftertreatment systems will be required to reduce these emissions to meet increasingly stringent emission regulations to minimize the impact to the environment. Diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC) are widely used in modern aftertreatment systems to convert unburned HC and CO, to partially convert NO to NO2 to enhance downstream selective catalytic reaction (SCR) catalyst efficiency via fast SCR and to periodically clean-up DPF via controlled soot oxidation. In this work, we focus on the performance difference between biodiesel and diesel over a commercial DOC catalyst to identify the knowledge gap during the transition from diesel fuel to biodiesel.

Cummins has recently launched next-generation aftertreatment technology, the Single ModuleTM aftertreatment system, for medium-duty and heavy-duty engines used in on-highway and off-highway applications. Besides meeting EPA 2010+ and Euro VI regulations, the Single ModuleTM aftertreatment system offers 60% volume and 40% weight reductions compared to current aftertreatment systems. In this work, we present model-based approaches that were systematically adopted in the design and development of the Cummins Single ModuleTM aftertreatment system. Particularly, a variety of analytical and experimental component-level and system-level validation tools have been used to optimize DOC, DPF, SCR/ASC, as well as the DEF decomposition device.

Upcoming, stricter diesel exhaust emissions standards will likely require aftertreatment architectures with multiple diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) introduction locations. Managing NH3 slip with technologies such as an ammonia slip catalyst (ASC) will continue to be critical in these future aftertreatment systems. In this study, we evaluate the impact of SO2 exposure on a state-of-the-art commercially available ASC. SO2 is co-fed at 0.5 or 3 ppmv to either approximate or accelerate a real-world exhaust SO2 impact. ASC performance during sulfur co-feeding is measured under a wide variety of simulated real-world conditions. Results indicate that the loss of NO conversion during SCR is dependent on the cumulative SO2 exposure, regardless of the inlet SO2 concentration. Meanwhile, N2O formation under SCR conditions is nonlinearly affected by SO2 exposure, with formation increasing during 0.5 ppmv SO2 exposure but decreasing in the presence of 3 ppmv SO2.