Search Results

The regulatory framework of pollutant emissions concerning non-road small internal combustion engines is becoming increasingly challenging. The upcoming scenario threatens to cut out small two-stroke engines because of the fuel short circuit occurring during transfer and exhaust ports overlap, causing the emission of unburned hydrocarbons and reducing engine efficiency. Despite this challenge, small two-stroke engines are unmatched in high power density applications in which weight and autonomy hinder the diffusion of electric technologies. The continuation of small two-stroke engines in the market will thus depend on the capability of mitigating fuel short circuit. From this perspective, some of the Authors found the low-pressure injection technology fulfilling the purpose at engine full load; however, in addition to system complexity and costs, a lack of mixture homogenization was noted at low load.

It is well known that 3D CFD simulations can give detailed information about fluid and flow properties in complex 3D domains while 1D CFD simulation can provide important information at a system level, i.e. about the performance of the entire engine. The drawbacks of the two simulation methods are that the former requires high computational cost while the latter is not able to capture complex local 3D features of the flow. Therefore, the two simulation methods are to be seen as complementary, indeed a coupling of the two approaches can benefit from the pros of the two methods while minimizing the cons. In particular, with a multi-scale modeling approach (1D-3D) it is possible to simulate large and complex domains by modeling the complex part with a 3D approach and the rest of the domain with a 1D approach.