Search Results

Traditionally, ground vehicle aerodynamics has been researched with highly simplified models such as the Ahmed body and the SAE model. These models established and advanced the fundamental understanding of bluff body aerodynamics and have generated a large body of published data, however, their application to the development of passenger vehicles is limited by the highly idealized nature of their geometries. To date, limited data has been openly published on aerodynamic investigations of production vehicles, most likely due to the proprietary nature of production vehicle geometry. In 2012, Heft et al. introduced the realistic generic car model ‘DrivAer’ that better represents the flow physics associated with a typical production vehicle.

Among the many sources of uncertainty in an unsteady computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation, the statistical uncertainty in the mean value of a fluctuating quantity (for example, the drag coefficient) is of practical importance for vehicle design and development. This uncertainty can be reduced by extending the simulation run length, however, this increases the computational cost and leads to longer turnaround times. Moreover, it is desirable to be able to run an unsteady CFD simulation for the minimum amount of time necessary to reach an acceptable amount of uncertainty in the quantity of interest. This work assesses several methods for calculating the uncertainty in the mean of an unsteady signal. Simulated noise is used to validate the methods, and evaluation is carried out using signals from CFD simulations of realistic vehicle geometries. Calculating the uncertainty in the difference between two signals is also discussed.

This paper presents a mechanical energy control volume analysis for incompressible flow around road vehicles using results from Detached Eddy Simulation Computational Fluid Dynamics calculations. The control volume approach equates the rate of work done by surface forces of the vehicle to (i) the rate of work and kinetic energy flux at the control volume boundaries (particularly in the vehicle wake) and (ii) the rate of energy loss in the domain. At the downstream control volume boundary, the wake terms can be divided into lift-induced and profile drag terms. The rate of energy loss in the domain can be used as a volumetric analog for drag (drag counts/m3, when normalized). This allows for a quantitative break down of the contributions of different flow features/regions to the overall drag force.

Three pickup truck variants of the Generic Truck Utility (GTU) are evaluated and compared using wind tunnel test data and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The configurations analyzed are the short cab/long box, medium cab/medium box, and long cab/short box geometries, which all share a common vehicle length and wheelbase. Both cab and box length are known to influence the total bluff body drag through the interaction of the cab wake in the pickup box with the total vehicle wake, and the GTU provides an excellent test box to investigate the details of these interactions. Experimental testing was conducted at the WindShear wind tunnel on a full-scale GTU model, while transient CFD simulations were carried out with IconCFD®, an open-source based solver. Experimental and CFD results are used to describe the general flow field around the vehicle, and a comparison is made with the wind tunnel integral force data as well as centerline pressure tap data.