Search Results

The cost of delivering the payloads to space increases dramatically with distance and therefore missions to deep space place a strong emphasis on reducing launch weight and eliminating resupply requirements. The Vapor Phase Catalytic Ammonia Removal (VPCAR) system, which is being developed for water purification, is an example of this focus because it has no resupply requirements. A key step in the VPCAR system is the catalytic oxidation of ammonia and volatile hydrocarbons to benign compounds such as carbon dioxide, water, and nitrogen. Currently, platinum-based commercial oxidation catalysts are being used for these reactions. However, conventional platinum catalysts can convert ammonia (NH3) to NO and NO2 (collectively referred to as NOX), which are more hazardous than ammonia.

As manned spacecraft travel farther from Earth, the cost of delivering the payloads to space increases dramatically. For example the cost of delivering a payload to low Earth orbit currently is about $10,000/lb. On the other hand the cost of delivering a payload to Mars may be up to 40 times greater and therefore missions to deep space place a strong emphasis on reducing launch weight and eliminating resupply requirements. The Vapor Phase Catalytic Ammonia Removal (VPCAR) system, which is being developed to purify water, is an example of this focus. In addition to having a lower launch weight than the Water Recycle System (WRS) currently used on the International Space Station, it also has no resupply requirements. A key step in the VPCAR system is the catalytic oxidation of ammonia and volatile hydrocarbons to benign compounds such as carbon dioxide, water, and nitrogen. Currently platinum-based commercial oxidation catalysts are being used for these reactions.

The Thermoelectric Integrated Membrane Evaporative Subsystem (TIMES) was evaluated to determine its ability to process reverse osmosis brine as one of the Advanced Water Processor steps. As the baselined membrane (Nafion 117) was unable to retain ammonia, a NASA-sponsored project was conducted to find an alternate membrane capable of retaining ammonia while maintaining reasonable water production rates. A long term test was performed with up to 90% water recovery using a hydrophilic membrane and a hydrophobic membrane. The ammonia rejection for the hydrophilic membrane was 80%. The average water production rates for both membranes were greater than for the pretreated baselined Nafion membrane.