Search Results

Robust engineering is an integral part of the quality initiative, Design For Six Sigma (DFSS), in most companies to enable good designs and products for reliability and durability. Taguchi’s signal-to-noise ratio has been considered as a good performance index for robustness for many years. An alternate approach that is direct and simple for measuring robustness is proposed. In this approach, robustness is measured in terms of an augmented output response and it is a composite index of variation and efficiency of a system. This formulation represents an engineering design intent of a product in a statistical sense, so engineers can understand, communicate, and resonate at ease. Robust formulations are illustrated and discussed with case studies for smaller-the-better, nominal-the-best, and dynamic responses. Confirmation runs of optimization show good agreement of the augmented response with the additive predictive models.

The design and development of electric vehicles involves many unique challenges. One such challenge involves accurately predicting driveline abuse torque loads early in the design cycle to aid with sizing drive-unit and driveline components. Since electrified drivelines typically lack a torque-limiting “fuse” element such as a torque converter or slipping clutch, they can be vulnerable to sudden transient events involving high wheel acceleration or deceleration. Component sizing must account for the loads caused by such events, and these loads must be accurately quantified early on when vehicle parameters haven’t been finalized yet. Early load predictions can be made by completing abuse maneuver simulations where key parameters are varied to gauge their influence on simulated loads. Understanding how these parameters impact loads allows for better risk assessment during the design process, as these parameters will inevitably change until a final design is iterated upon.