Search Results

In this study we collect and analyze data on how hands-free automated lane centering systems affect the controllability of a hazardous event during an operational situation by a human operator. Through these data and their analysis, we seek to answer the following questions: Is Level 2 and Level 3 automated driving inherently uncontrollable as a result of a steering failure? Or, is there some level of operator control of hazardous situations occurring during Level 2 and Level 3 automated driving that can reasonably be expected, given that these systems still rely on a driver as the primary fall back. The controllability focus group experiments were carried out using an instrumented MY15 Jeep® Cherokee with a prototype Level 2 automated driving system that was modified to simulate a hands-free steering system on a closed track with speeds up to 110kph. The vehicle was also fitted with supplemental safety measures to ensure experimenter control.

The Continuous Fluid Level and Quality Indicator (CFLQI) technology is focused on increasing the sampling frequency of brake fluid reservoir volume and detecting specific brake fluid contaminants. CFLQI targets to improve diagnostics detection range and resulting degraded vehicle operation strategies by increasing sensitivity to brake fluid loss and the addition of a fluid quality feature. The theory of CFLQI is to improve future autonomous and highly automated vehicle performance, both of which will have reduced driver input and service schedules, by providing earlier fluid level and fluid health warnings. The two technologies selected to prove theory of operation were ultra-sonic sensor and capacitive sense element technology. Both technologies show initial capability to meet fluid sensing targets with system level ASIL D ASIC design. The CFLQI compliments and improves upon current technology of brake pad wear sensors, leak detection diagnostics and brake fluid level monitoring.