Search Results

With an increasing focus on the reduction of greenhouse gases by the transport industries and continued development of connected and autonomous vehicle systems, the potential for aerodynamic drag reduction by means of managed systems of vehicles travelling in close-proximity, termed “platooning”, has continued as topic for research. Early-work in passenger-car platooning was conducted by varying the spacing between vehicles in homogeneous platoons. More recently the use of systematic changes in upper-body geometry has provided data for another variable in the assessment of platooning characteristics. The results of the investigation described in this paper adds to previously published platooning results using the Windsor reference model. For this investigation a new add-on geometry to the standard nose was designed to provide a simplified bonnet feature.

The aerodynamic effects of bodies in close proximity continues to be an interest for those involved in aeronautical, automotive and civil engineering together with those involved in sports such as cycling, motor racing and sailing. For passenger cars, research in the USA published in the 1980s had considered travelling in close proximity, termed “platooning”, as a means for reducing congestion. But the aerodynamic drag reduction and fuel-savings found in associated wind tunnel tests and road-trials became the focus of further investigations. Although practical applications were not originally pursued, the recent development of control systems for connected and autonomous vehicles has provided the opportunity for platooning to be considered again within future traffic management systems.

The work described in this paper is a continuation of an investigation into the effects of systematic changes in upper-body geometry on the aerodynamic drag of passenger-car-like bluff-body models in close longitudinal proximity and operating in platoon formations. The original work, presented in SAE paper 2019-01-0659, showed measurements of the aerodynamic drag of individual models within three-model platoons and for which each model was tested in three different upper-body configurations This provided a data-set of 27 platoon configurations to compare with the three baseline conditions of the isolated models. The work contrasted with other published platooning research in which the spacing, between homogeneous models in the platoons, was the only variable to be considered. In this publication the results of further wind tunnel tests, using the same models as before but in two-model platoons, providing a further 9 test configurations are compared with the original data.