Search Results

A comparison between ‘Quasi-Transient’ and Steady-State (SAE J1349) engine dynamometer horsepower test procedures was conducted to determine the degree of correlation between the two test methods. Measurements demonstrated that the peak horsepower and torque measured using both techniques was similar. This information is useful as a development tool, because the ‘Quasi-Transient’ procedure allows for data to be collected over the engine RPM range much faster then the Steady-State method, allowing for the accurate testing of more engine/exhaust configurations in a shorter amount of time.

Frequency domain testing has had limited use in the past for durability evaluations of automotive components. Recent advances and new perspectives now make it a viable option. Using frequency domain testing for components, test times can be greatly reduced, resulting in considerable savings of time, money, and resources. Quality can be built into the component, thus making real-time subsystem and full vehicle testing and development more meaningful. Time domain testing historically started with block cycle histogram tests. Improved capabilities of computers, controllers, math procedures, and algorithms have led to real time simulation in the laboratory. Real time simulation is a time domain technique for duplicating real world environments using computer controlled multi-axial load inputs. It contains all phase information as in the recorded proving ground data. However, normal equipment limitations prevent the operation at higher frequencies.