Search Results

Despite the many years of widespread use of the BMW Intake Valve Deposit (IVD) vehicle test, relatively little has been published quantifying the variation in the test procedure. This paper presents an analysis of the variability in the BMW test. Though results from 8045 km (8K; 5,000 mile) tests rather than 16090 km (16K; 10,000 mile) are highlighted due to the size of the available database and relative sensitivity of the data, analysis suggests that variation at 8K is representative of 16K variation. A square root transformation of average deposit weight at 8K, though more cumbersome than the more common log transformation, is found to be the most appropriate way to eliminate the dependence of variation on the absolute level of deposits. Within-car variation is found to account for over half of the test-to-test variation, contradicting the notion that car-to-car differences are the dominant source of variability.

This paper features the results of emission tests conducted on diesel oxidation catalysts, and the combination of diesel oxidation catalysts and water blend fuel (diesel fuel continuous emulsion). Vehicle chassis emission tests were conducted using an urban bus. The paper reviews the impact and potential benefits of combining catalyst and water blend diesel fuel technologies to reduce exhaust emissions from diesel engines.

In response to industry demands for a method to qualify fuels for their intake valve deposit (IVD) forming tendencies, the Coordinating Research Council (CRC) has developed an engine dynamometer test procedure. In Phase I, the 2.3L Ford engine was chosen as the focus test engine in comparison testing with two other high volume U.S. manufactured engines.1* A two-mode dynamometer test was developed in Phases II-A & II-B and shown to discriminate among the test fuels at a 95% confidence level.2 In Phase III, both an interlaboratory study (ILS) of the two-mode dynamometer test and a vehicle fleet study were performed. The ILS was conducted to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the test procedure and also to fulfill requirements for consideration of the test as an American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard.