Refine Your Search

Date

Date

Topic

Topic

Quality audits Documentation Terminology G-14 Americas Aerospace Quality Standards Committee (AAQSC)

Search Results

Viewing 1 to 20 of 30
12Next >Last >>
Sort by title
Standard

Statistical Product Acceptance Requirements Using Isolated Lot Sampling Methods
2005-10-27
HISTORICAL
ARP9013/1
The purpose of this SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) is to ensure conformance for each product characteristic being verified in a lot, without maintaining information from previous lots. ARP9013/1 specifies a product acceptance system for isolated lots. For example, isolated lot sampling avoids keeping track of the normal, tightened, and reduced levels of sampling formerly used in MIL-STD-105 and currently used in ANSI/ASQC Z1.4. Because those switching rules provided significant long-term protection for product quality, these isolated lot tables replace that protection in other ways.
Standard

Requirements for Oversight of Aerospace Quality Management System Registration/Certification Programs
2007-03-29
HISTORICAL
AS9104/2
These requirements are applicable to IAQG global sectors when utilizing Aerospace Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) schemes for the assessment and certification of supplier quality systems in accordance with the requirements contained in 9104. IAQG member companies have committed to perform sufficient oversight of the Aerospace accreditation/certification assessment processes in order to ensure conformance to established requirements contained in 9104. NOTE: The IAQG OPMT oversight structure is depicted graphically in Appendix A.
Standard

Requirements for Conducting Audits of Aviation, Space, and Defense Quality Management Systems
2022-11-29
CURRENT
AS9101G
This standard defines requirements for the preparation and execution of the audit process. In addition, it defines the content and composition for the audit reporting of conformity and process effectiveness to the 9100-series standards, the organization's QMS documentation, and customer and statutory/regulatory requirements. The requirements in this standard are additions or represent changes to the requirements and guidelines in the standards for conformity assessment, auditing, and certification as published by ISO/IEC (i.e., ISO/IEC 17000, ISO/IEC 17021-1). When there is conflict with these standards, the requirements of the 9101 standard shall take precedence.
Standard

Requirements for Certification/Registration of Aerospace Quality Management Systems
2003-07-23
HISTORICAL
AIR5359B
The requirements defined in this AIR are applicable to Accreditation Bodies (ABs), Certification/Registration Bodies (CRBs), and Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), during assessment and/or certification/registration to the applicable quality management system standard to meet industry accepted practices.
Standard

Quality Systems Non-Conformance Documentation
2001-12-21
HISTORICAL
AS9131
This document defines to supplier/subcontractor common information and documentation required to inform Customers, when applicable about nonconformity (Customer-provider use). It does not apply to the reporting of a nonconformity to the product owner/operator. Reporting of Product Quality Escapes and use of Waiver/Concession is subject to the terms and conditions of the contractual requirements.
Standard

Quality System Assessment
2002-04-24
HISTORICAL
AS9101A
The purpose of this document is to define the content and the presentation of the Assessment Report of the section 1 of the AS/EN/JISQ 9100, based on ISO 9001-2000.
Standard

Quality System Assessment
2000-09-01
HISTORICAL
AS9101
The purpose of this procedure is to define the content and the presentation of the Assessment Report.
Standard

Quality Management Systems – Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense Organizations – Non-Deliverable Software (Supplement to 9100:2016)
2020-09-16
WIP
AS9115/2
Non-deliverable software is defined as software that facilitates the design, development, manufacture, inspection, test, acceptance, or calibration of a deliverable product, and is not generally delivered under a contract. This may include deliverable services software such as but not limited to maintenance procedures, order processing and/or various types of online technical support resources. As Industry efforts increase to improve product quality and reliability and reduce production costs, use of computer software programs for automation, control and monitoring of production processes and product test, acceptance and calibration is also increasing. It is therefore vital to assure these software programs are controlled to ensure product conformity requirements are properly supported.
Standard

Quality Management Systems - Requirements for Aviation, Space, and Defense Organizations
2016-09-20
CURRENT
AS9100D
This standard includes ISO 9001:20152 quality management system requirements and specifies additional aviation, space, and defense industry requirements, definitions, and notes. It is emphasized that the requirements specified in this standard are complementary (not alternative) to customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. If there is a conflict between the requirements of this standard and customer or applicable statutory or regulatory requirements, the latter shall take precedence.
Standard

Quality Management Systems - Nonconformance Documentation - Word Format
2007-09-26
AS9131AW
AS9131 - This standard defines the common nonconformance data definition and documentation that an internal or external supplier or sub-tier supplier must submit when informing a customer of a nonconformity. The requirements shall be are applicable for reporting a nonconforming product to the owner/operator (i.e., end item user), if specified by contract. Reporting of nonconformance data, either electronically or conventionally on paper, is subject to the terms and conditions of the contract. This also includes, where applicable, data access under export control regulations.
Standard

Qualification Procedure for Aerospace Standard Parts
2002-07-16
HISTORICAL
AS9133
This document provides a basic uniform method for ensuring that aerospace standard parts (products) conform with the requirements of technical specifications referring to qualified parts and for a manufacturer of such parts to have a qualified management system at least equivalent to AS/EN/SJAC9100. These standards apply when called out in the aerospace standard part standard.
Standard

Inspection and Test Quality System
2001-10-01
HISTORICAL
AS9003
This document contains the minimum requirements for supplier Inspection and Test Quality System. It is emphasized that the quality system requirements specified in this standard are complementary (not alternative) to the contractual and applicable law and regulatory requirements.
Standard

Guidance for the Application of AQAP 2110 within a 9100 Quality Management System
2024-02-07
WIP
ARP9137A
This document has been prepared and issued to provide information and guidance on the application of AQAP 2110 when the Supplier adheres to the provisions of 9100. This document is published as AQAP 2009 Annex F and 9137. It was jointly developed by NATO and industry representatives for use by NATO and industry to facilitate the use and understanding of the relationship between the AQAP 2110 and 9100.
Standard

Direct Ship Guidance for Aerospace Companies
2021-09-14
CURRENT
ARP9114B
This document is limited to the aerospace industry, where an approved manufacturer requests a supplier to ship an article against the approved manufacturer’s quality system directly to a customer. The direct ship process is not required or applicable to standard parts or military parts. In this process, the approved manufacturer is responsible for assurance that the article conforms to type design information.
Standard

Direct Delivery Authorization Guidance for Aerospace Companies
2005-09-09
HISTORICAL
ARP9107
Limited to the Commercial Aerospace industry where a request is made for a Production Organization (PO) to have Direct Delivery Authorization (DDA), which includes an Appropriate Arrangement (AA) between the PO and the Design Organization (DO). In this process the DO is responsible for ensuring the continuous updating of design and airworthiness data to the PO, whilst the PO is responsible for assurance that the manufactured article conforms to Approved Design and Airworthiness Data. The PO is responsible to provide airworthiness release documentation.
Standard

Direct Delivery Authorization Guidance for Aerospace Companies
2017-11-09
CURRENT
ARP9107A
Limited to the commercial aerospace industry where a request is made for a PO to have Direct Delivery Authorization (DDA), which includes an Appropriate Arrangement (AA) between the PO and the Design Organization (DO). In this process the DO is responsible for ensuring the continuous updating of design and airworthiness data to the PO, whilst the PO is responsible for assurance that the manufactured article conforms to approved design and airworthiness data. The PO is responsible to provide airworthiness release documentation.
Standard

Data Matrix (2D) Coding Quality Requirements for Parts Marking
2002-02-26
HISTORICAL
AS9132
This Standard defines uniform Quality and Technical requirements relative to metallic parts marking performed in using "Data Matrix symbology" (2D) coding used within the aerospace industry. The ISO 16022 specifies general requirements (data characters encodation, error correction rules, decoding algorithm, etc.). In addition to this specification, part Identification with such coding is subject to the following requirements to ensure electronic reading (scanning) ability of the symbol. The marking processes covered by this standard are as follows: Dot Peening Laser Marking Electro-Chem Etching Further marking processes will be included if required. Unless specified otherwise in the contractual business relationship, the company responsible for the design of the part shall determine the location of the Data Matrix Marking. Symbol position should allow illumination from all sides for readability.
12Next >Last >>
X