Search Results

A study was conducted to determine the potential reduction in automotive fuel consumption based on the use of innovative systems and improved components. Technological areas investigated were: spark ignited engines with and without turbocharging, electronic feedback controlled fuel injection with duel bed catalytic converters, stratified charge combustion, light weight diesels, lock-up torque converters, continuously variable ratio transmission, tires aerodynamic drag, vehicle weight, engine accessories and optional equipment. Standard and compact-size 1973 model year vehicles were selected for analysis using a computer-simulation program to predict fuel usage and performance with and without incorporation of the improvements. In addition estimates were made as to whether modified vehicles complied with study constraints such as emission, safety, noise and user requirements.

Cost is one of the critical factors in the commercialization of PEM fuel cells in automotive markets. Arthur D. Little has been working with the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies to assess the cost of fuel-flexible reformer proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell systems based on near-term technology but cost modeled at high production volumes and to assess future technology scenarios. Integral to this effort has been the development of a system configuration (in conjunction with Argonne National Laboratories), specification of performance parameters and catalyst requirements, development of representative component designs and manufacturing processes for these components, and development of a comprehensive bill of materials and list of purchased components. The model, data, and component designs have been refined based on comments from the Freedom Car Technical Team and fuel cell system and component developers.

Arthur D. Little in conjunction with the Department of Energy and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs are developing an ethanol fuel processor for fuel cell vehicles. Initial studies were carried out on a 25 kWe catalytic partial oxidation (POX) reformer to determine the effect of equivalence ratio, steam to carbon ratio, and residence time on ethanol conversion. Results of the POX experiments show near equilibrium yields of hydrogen and carbon monoxide for an equivalence ratio of 3.0 with a fuel processor efficiency of 80%. The size and weight of the prototype reformer yield power densities of 1.44 l/kW and 1.74 kg/kW at an estimated cost of $20/kW.

Industrial grade ethanol, in concentrations ranging from 130 proof to 200 proof, can be used as a feedstock for a 50kWe advanced fuel processor developed by Arthur D. Little, Inc. for fuel cell vehicles. At 180 proof concentration, hydrated ethanol showed no performance degradation compared with both 200 proof (pure) ethanol and E95 (95% ethanol and 5% gasoline) at equivalence ratios ranging from 3.0 to 4.0. Environmental benefits associated with the use of ethanol in fuel cell power systems include its production from renewable biological sources, low toxicity in the event of an accidental spill, and recycling of carbon dioxide released by the process back to the plant matter used as ethanol feedstock. Cost savings associated with the use of hydrated ethanol are expected to include lower production costs, lower distribution costs, and lower powerplant costs due to the possibility of system simplification.

In addition to high-profile fuel cell applications such as automotive propulsion and distributed power generation, the use of fuel cells as auxiliary power units (APU) for vehicles has received considerable attention. APU applications may be an attractive market because fuel cells offer some attractive features for APU applications and the APU market offers a true mass-market opportunity that does not require some of the challenging performance and cost targets required for propulsion systems for vehicles. In this paper we discuss the technical performance requirements for PEM and SOFC APUs, as well as the current status of the technology and the implications for fuel cell system configuration and cost.

While it is generally agreed that the PEM fuel cell technology is best for road vehicles, the need for a source of relatively pure hydrogen poses significant challenges. There are two distinct options that are currently being considered: On-board processing of gasoline or methanol Fueling with hydrogen gas made in an off-board facility Each option has different implications for the fueling infrastructure and for the technologies required both on- and off-board the vehicle. In addition, various fueling strategies shift the balance of risk between fuel providers and vehicle manufacturers. Generally speaking, alternative fueling options can be seen to trade off technical risk (e.g., will it work?) for commercial risk (e.g., will anyone buy it?). In seeking a satisfactory business solution, a key issue is the balance between these two risks on the part of the vehicle manufacturer and the fuel provider.

After about a decade of considerable investments in polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEMFC) and in solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology, both are being actively considered for vehicle applications. The two vehicle applications being most actively considered for fuel cells are propulsion (mainly for PEMFC) and auxiliary power (for both PEMFC and SOFC). For all transportation applications, fuel cells promise the benefits of clean and quiet operation, potentially low maintenance and high efficiency, and ultimately greater utility to drivers and passengers. Initial system and vehicle prototypes have started to demonstrate some of these benefits, but much technology development is still needed before commercialization can occur. Not surprisingly then, there are serious hurdles to be overcome if fuel cells are to become true competitors for internal combustion engines (ICEs) in automotive applications.

One of the biggest barriers to commercialization of fuel cell vehicles is the high cost of materials and manufacturing of fuel cell components. Precious metal materials in the membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) account for more than 17 percent of the total cost of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell systems. Precious metals such as platinum may also be required for fuel processing catalysts. The Department of Energy (DOE) is addressing the important issue of the cost of fuel cell components by supporting R&D projects aimed at improving the performance of fuel cells which would lead to reduced platinum loading, as well as developing low-cost automated industrial processes for the manufacture of electrodes and MEAs. Other projects include development of a supply-demand elasticity model. The long term reserves and availability of platinum is a serious issue facing the commercial viability of fuel cell vehicles.

A corona discharge device (CDD) used in conjunction with automotive stoichiometric catalysts has been shown to be effective in reducing exhaust tailpipe emissions and catalytic converter light-off temperatures. The CDD used here is a low power, low cost corona discharge device mounted ahead of the catalytic converter in the exhaust stream. Creation of radicals and other oxidizing species in the exhaust by the non-thermal plasma is shown to significantly improve catalyst conversion efficiencies for HC, CO and NOx. Burner flow data shows improvement in steady-state conversion efficiencies as well as improved catalyst light-off performance. Engine-dynamometer and vehicle data on spark ignition engines using production type (stoichiometric) control also shows improved performance with aged catalysts, and various levels of fuel sulfur. The reversibility of sulfur poisoning was also observed.

A cold-start partial oxidation (POX) system was integrated with a modern flexible fuel engine to assess its impact on cold-start performance and emissions. The POX reactor, a small combustion device operating fuel rich, converts liquid fuel into gaseous fuel species (reformate). The reformate from the reactor, when mixed with combustion air, replaces or supplements the standard fuel consumed during an engine start. This prototype integrated cold-start system has successfully reduced emissions from a cold-start on fuel grade ethanol (E95) at 5°C. The integrated POX system reduced the time-averaged hydrocarbon (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions by 80 and 40 percent, respectively. Starts on E95 reformate were achieved in less than 10 seconds at temperatures as low as -20°C.