Search Results

Commercial automotive diesel engine service and repair, post a diagnostic trouble code trigger, relies on standard troubleshooting steps laid down to identify or narrow down to a faulty engine component. This manual process is cumbersome, time-taking, costly, often leading to incorrect part replacement and most importantly usually associated with significant downtime of the vehicle. Current study aims to address these issues using a novel in-house simulation-based approach developed using a Digital Twin of the engine which is capable of conducting in-mission troubleshooting with real world vehicle/engine data. This cost-effective and computationally efficient solution quickly provides the cause of the trouble code without having to wait for the vehicle to reach the service bay. The simulation is performed with a one-dimensional fluid dynamics, detailed thermodynamics and heat transfer-based diesel engine model utilizing the GT-POWER engine performance tool.

Coolant filters have been used for nearly 50 years by heavy duty engine manufacturers but little has been published in the technical literature documenting their performance. In heavy duty cooling systems an extender is periodically added to the system to prevent the coolant from becoming corrosive and replenish additives that stop the build-up of deposits which reduce heat transfer. Not only is the coolant filter the most convenient and reliable method to deliver the extender to the cooling system, it also removes debris from the coolant which can cause deposits and wear, aggravate corrosion, and even plug heat exchangers. Additionally, the used coolant filter serves as a diagnostic trouble shooting tool. This paper concentrates on the value or importance of filtering debris from the coolant of heavy duty diesel engine cooling systems. Published literature is reviewed and recent data from lab testing is reported.

The performance of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) that recovers heat from the exhaust of a heavy-duty diesel engine was simulated. The work was an extension of a prior study that simulated the performance of an experimental ORC system developed and tested at Oak Ridge National laboratory (ORNL). The experimental data were used to set model parameters and validate the results of that simulation. For the current study the model was adapted to consider a 15 liter turbocharged engine versus the original 1.9 liter light-duty automotive turbodiesel studied by ORNL. Exhaust flow rate and temperature data for the heavy-duty engine were obtained from Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) for a range of steady-state engine speeds and loads without EGR. Because of the considerably higher exhaust gas flow rates of the heavy-duty engine, relative to the engine tested by ORNL, a different heat exchanger type was considered in order to keep exhaust pressure drop within practical bounds.