Search Results

This paper reports on Ford's participation in the PNGV ‘Ad Hoc’ Diesel Fuel Test program - Phase I. The purpose of this program was to assess the potential benefits of various fuel properties aimed at reducing engine-out emissions of NOx and particulates to meet LEV2 and Tier 2 emission standards. Four alternative fuels were evaluated using a Ford 1.2L DIATA diesel engine: 1) California Certification fuel (CARB), 2) low sulfur hydro-cracked fuel (LSHC), 3) LSHC fuel with a 15% Dimethoxy Methane blend (DMM), and 4) neat Fischer-Tropsch (FT100) fuel. Design of Experiments (DOE) and conventional techniques were used to evaluate the fuels at five speed and load conditions. Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), injection rail pressure, and beginning of injection (BOI) timing were controlled during the tests. Steady-state engine performance, emissions, and cylinder pressure (combustion) data were recorded for each fuel.

Current and proposed emissions standards in the United States, Europe and Japan are creating unique markets for the introduction of new powertrain technology. Adding to the complexity of the evolving tailpipe emission standards are differing vehicle and dynamometer test cycles and increased emphasis on CO2 reduction and higher vehicle fuel economy. In addressing the challenges posed by increasingly more stringent emissions standards and demands for high efficiency powertrain technologies, partitioning the tailpipe emissions requirements has the potential to identify and dimension significant design, development and systems tasks. This paper describes the use of emissions index, the ratio of emissions mass flow to fuel mass flow, to define the tailpipe emissions capabilities required from engine/fuel/calibration and after-treatment/control systems.