Search Results

This paper is a continuation of previously published technical paper SAE 2022-01-0314. The preceding work described an analytical methodology to predict the vehicle interior trim squeak and rattle issues upfront in the design cycle using a “relative displacement” or “contact force” metric; the methodology was implemented on the center floor console armrest latch using a linear finite element model. The work is logically extended to predict the squeak and rattle issues quantitatively using now an “acoustic noise” metric, this enables a direct comparison with the physical test results and helps to further refine the design best practices. This approach combines Finite Element Method (FEM) and Boundary Element Method (BEM) to estimate structural vibration response and acoustic sound pressure respectively.

The battery cell unit and battery module constitute the building blocks for the battery pack in an electric vehicle. It is important to rigorously understand the vibration induced response of the battery pack as it is a prerequisite for the safety of an electric vehicle. An accurate finite element (FE) model plays a key role in predicting the dynamic response of the battery pack simulation. In this paper, finite element analysis (FEA) results are compared with the experimental set up of the battery components and a 60-cell battery module. Using orthotropic elastic constants instead of isotropic properties to model the fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) made battery components produced better modal results correlation. Modal frequency values for the brick components have been improved by 25% to 50%. For the battery module, swapping of mode shape behavior is observed between finite element model and experimental results.