Search Results

Exhaust emissions from various kinds of clean diesel fuels were evaluated using a commercial DI diesel engine in comparison with the emissions from a commercial diesel fuel containing 0.05% sulfur. The blending of a light paraffinic fuel to a commercial diesel fuel reduces HC, CO, PM and NOx emissions and a light fuel with aromatics or kerosene reduces PM and NOx but not HC and CO. The PM and NOx emissions from the paraffinic fuel are lower than these from the kerosene, and these emissions are decreased with an increase in the blending ratio of both light fuels to a commercial diesel fuel. Reformulated diesel fuels such as a clean city diesel fuel and fuels with few aromatics reduce PM and NOx emissions more than commercial diesel fuel, and the reduction rate is highly dependent on aromatic content. The effects on emissions of blending soybean methyl ester or tripropylene glycol methyl ether to a commercial diesel fuel were evaluated.

The effects of fuel properties on white smoke emission from the latest DI diesel engine were investigated with a new type of white smoke meter. The new smoke meter could distinguish fuel effects on smoke much more than the conventional PHS meter. The repeatability of the smoke meter was better than that of the PHS meter. Cetane number was the dominant factor for smoke emission. Distillation temperature and composition also affected emission. A nitrate type cetane improver was effective for reducing emission. White smoke was analyzed with GC and HPLC and compounds in white smoke from low cetane number fuel were found almost the same as in fuel. But those from high cetane number fuel consisted of compounds in fuel and many combustion products.

Under hot transient conditions, the effects of gasoline properties, such as the research octane number (RON), the motor octane number (MON) and types of components on acceleration performance were investigated using four ‘Premium Gasoline Required Vehicles’ which are Japanese commercial vehicles equipped with knock sensors (KSs) and an electronic control unit (ECU) to prevent the engines from knocking. Regarding the fuel, two series of fuels were used. One of them {Primary Reference Fuel Series (PRF series)} was prepared to investigate the effectiveness of the octane number of PRF (ON). The other {Components Series (COMP series)} was prepared to investigate the effects of fuel components on the same. Fuels in the COMP series had almost the same RON level, which was almost equal to 90. In the PRF series, the acceleration performance of all vehicles were improved as ON increased.

The addition of soybean methyl ester (SME) to diesel fuel has significantly reduced HC and PM emissions, but it increases the NOx emission slightly when measured with exhaust emission evaluation mode for heavy-duty DI diesel engines or D-13 mode in Japan. Also, under partial load conditions, the SME addition increases the PM emission due to an increase in the SOF emission. However, the addition of lighter fractions or kerosene to diesel fuel reduces NOx and PM emissions but increases HC and CO emissions measured by D-13 mode. In addition, under full load conditions, the lighter fuel seldom reduces PM emission. Therefore, the exhaust emissions emitted from the blends of SME, kerosene, and cetane improver to low sulfur diesel fuel are evaluated using the latest DI diesel engine with a turbo-charger and inter-cooler. The clean fuel reduces over 20% of PM under a wide range of engine conditions including D-13 mode without an increase in NOx, HC, and CO emissions.

Crosscheck tests of fast electrical mobility spectrometers, Differential Mobility Spectroscopy (DMS) and Engine Exhaust Particle Sizer(EEPS), were conducted to evaluate the accuracy of fine particle measurement. Two kinds of particles were used as test particles for the crosscheck test of instruments: particles emitted from diesel vehicles and diluted in a full dilution tunnel, and particles generated by CAST. In the steady state tests, it was confirmed that the average concentration of each instrument was within the range of ±2σ from the average concentration of all the same type of instruments. In the transient tests, it is verified that the instruments have almost equal sensitivity. For application of the fast electrical mobility spectrometers to evaluation of particle number and size distributions, it is essential to develop a calibration method using reference particle counters and sizers (CPC, SMPS, etc.) and maintenance methods appropriate for each model.