Refine Your Search

Topic

Search Results

Viewing 1 to 15 of 15
Standard

Aerospace Active Inceptor Systems for Aircraft Flight and Engine Controls

2018-07-24
CURRENT
ARP5764
The purpose of this document is to develop the general characteristics and requirements for feel-force control systems for active cockpit controllers, also known as Active Inceptors. The document presents technical material that describes the recommended key characteristics and design considerations for these types of systems. Where appropriate, the effects of platform specific requirements (e.g., single axis/dual axis, single seat/dual seat, civil/military, rotorcraft/fixed wing aircraft, etc.) are clearly identified. The material developed will serve as a reference guide for: a Aircraft prime contractors who want to understand active cockpit controller technology and develop their own set of requirements; b Suppliers that develop active cockpit controller equipment and; c Regulatory Authorities who will be involved in the certification of these types of systems.
Standard

DESCRIPTION OF ACTUATION SYSTEMS FOR AIRCRAFT WITH FLY-BY-WIRE FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS

1999-05-01
HISTORICAL
AIR4253
This AIR provides a description of representative state-of-the-art, fly-by-wire (FBW) actuation systems used in flight control systems of manned aircraft. It presents the basic characteristics, hardware descriptions, redundancy concepts, functional schematics, and discussions of the servo controls, failure monitoring, and fault tolerance. All existing FBW actuation systems are not described herein; however, those most representing the latest designs are included. While this AIR is intended as a reference source of information for future aircraft actuation system designs, the exclusion or omission of any other appropriate actuation system or subsystem should not limit consideration of their use on future aircraft.
Standard

Description of Actuation Systems for Aircraft With Fly-By-Wire Flight Control Systems

2001-04-01
HISTORICAL
AIR4253A
This information report (AIR) provides design information of various contemporary aircraft fly-by-wire (FBW) flight control actuation systems that may be useful in the design of future systems for similar applications. It is primarily applicable to manned aircraft. It presents the basic characteristics, hardware descriptions, redundancy concepts, functional schematics, and discussions of the servo controls, failure monitoring, and fault tolerance. All existing FBW actuation systems are not described herein; however, those most representing the latest designs are included. While this AIR is intended as a reference source of information for aircraft actuation system designs, the exclusion or omission of any other appropriate actuation system or subsystem should not limit consideration of their use on future aircraft.
Standard

Description of Actuation Systems for Aircraft With Fly-By-Wire Flight Control Systems

2018-07-24
CURRENT
AIR4253B
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) provides design information of various contemporary aircraft fly-by-wire (FBW) flight control actuation systems that may be useful in the design of future systems for similar applications. It is primarily applicable to manned aircraft. It presents the basic characteristics, hardware descriptions, redundancy concepts, functional schematics, and discussions of the servo controls, failure monitoring, and fault tolerance. All existing FBW actuation systems are not described herein; however, those most representing the latest designs are included. While this AIR is intended as a reference source of information for aircraft actuation system designs, the exclusion or omission of any other appropriate actuation system or subsystem should not limit consideration of their use on future aircraft.
Standard

Design Guidelines for Aircraft Mechanical Control Systems and Components

2022-11-22
CURRENT
ARP5770A
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) provides design guidelines for aircraft mechanical control systems and components. Topics contained in this document include design requirements, system design and installation guidelines, and component design practices for primary flight controls, secondary flight controls, and utility controls.
Standard

FLUIDIC TECHNOLOGY

1995-06-01
HISTORICAL
ARP993
The scope of this document is limited to encompass terminology, symbols, performance criteria and certain elementary test methods reflecting the current status of the technology.
Standard

FLUIDIC TECHNOLOGY

2011-08-10
HISTORICAL
ARP993A
The scope of this document is limited to encompass terminology, symbols, performance criteria and certain elementary test methods reflecting the current status of the technology.
Standard

FLUIDIC TECHNOLOGY

1995-06-01
HISTORICAL
ARP993B
The scope of this document is limited to encompass terminology, symbols, performance criteria and methods reflecting the current status of the technology.
Standard

Fluidic Technology

2007-01-11
HISTORICAL
ARP993C
The scope of this document is limited to encompass terminology, symbols, performance criteria and methods reflecting the current status of the technology.
Standard

Fluidic Technology

2012-05-31
CURRENT
ARP993D
The scope of this document is limited to encompass terminology, symbols, performance criteria and methods reflecting the current status of the technology.
Standard

POWER SOURCES FOR FLUIDIC CONTROLS

1991-11-01
HISTORICAL
AIR1245
This AIR concerns itself with the end use of Fluidic (or Flueric) control hardware on aerospace vehicle applications. The fluidic control hardware application is viewed as a system comprised of the following subsystems: Power Source Power Conditioner Fluidic/Flueric Control(s) This AIR identifies potential power sources and relates the design of the fluidic/flueric controls to the nature of both the power source and, as required, the power conditioner. In the unlikely event that the power source yields a fluid which is always at the desired pressure level, temperature range and flow rate capacity and, further, is free of particulate or liquid contaminate, pressure pulsation, etc., no power conditioner is required. Experience has shown that the power conditioner is usually necessary to assure operability and reliability of the total control system.
Standard

Power Sources for Fluidic Controls

2012-05-31
CURRENT
AIR1245B
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) presents a review of the types and general characteristics of power sources that may be used to provide the power for gaseous or liquid fluidic control systems. Fluidic definitions, terminology, units and symbols are defined in Reference 2.1.1.
Standard

Power Sources for Fluidic Controls

2007-01-11
HISTORICAL
AIR1245A
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) presents a review of the types and general characteristics of power sources that may be used to provide the power for gaseous or liquid fluidic control systems. Fluidic definitions, terminology, units and symbols are defined in Reference 2.1.1.
Standard

Utility System Characterization, An Overview

2021-02-23
WIP
AIR5428A
Modern air vehicles consist of many subsystems, traditionally managed as a federation of independent subsystems. Advances in control technologies, digital electronics and electro-mechanical hardware, provide potential opportunities to integrate subsystems for future aircraft. This document does not define any particular integration strategy. Its purpose is to provide information about traditional federated subsystems from the functional, control, resource, and hardware perspective. To be able to integrate subsystems, one must have a basic understanding of the subsystems, and this document provides an introduction or starting point for initiating the integration process.
Standard

Utility System Characterization, an Overview

2013-05-28
CURRENT
AIR5428
Modern air vehicles consist of many subsystems, traditionally managed as a federation of independent subsystems. Advances in control technologies, digital electronics and electro-mechanical hardware, provide potential opportunities to integrate subsystems for future aircraft. This document does not define any particular integration strategy. Its purpose is to provide information about traditional federated subsystems from the functional, control, resource, and hardware perspective. To be able to integrate subsystems, one must have a basic understanding of the subsystems, and this document provides an introduction or starting point for initiating the integration process. The focus is on the aircraft subsystems, which includes utility, flight and propulsion control (e.g., electric power, environmental control subsystem (ECS), fuel, etc.) The depth of the information intends to provide an introduction to the subsystems.
X