Search Results

Knock in a HCCI engine was examined by comparing subjective evaluation, recorded sound radiation from the engine, and cylinder pressure. Because HCCI combustion involved simultaneous heat release in a spatially large region, substantial oscillations were often found in the pressure signal. The time development of the audible signal within a knock cycle was different from that of the pressure trace. Thus the audible signal was not the attenuated transmission of the cylinder pressure oscillation but the sound radiation from the engine structure vibration excited by the initial few cycles of pressure oscillation. A practical knock limited maximum load point for the specific 2.3 L I4 engine under test (and arguably for engines of similar size and geometry) was defined at when the maximum rate of cycle-averaged pressure rise reached 5 MPa/ms.

The impact of intake air temperature and humidity on gasoline HCCI engine operation was assessed. The 2.3 L I4 production engine modified for single cylinder operation was controlled by using variable cam phasing on both the intake and exhaust valve in the negative-valve-overlap mode. Exhaust cam phasing was mainly used to control load, and intake cam phasing was mainly used to control combustion phasing. At stoichiometric condition, higher intake air temperature advanced combustion phasing and promoted knock, resulting in a 19% reduction of the Net Indicated Mean Effective Pressure (NIMEP) at the high load limit at 1500 rpm when intake temperature was changed from −10 to 100° C. Higher ambient humidity delayed combustion phasing. For stoichiometric operation, this delay allowed a small extension (a few tenths of a bar in NIMEP) in the high load limit when the moisture concentration was changed from 3 to 30 g/m3 (corresponding to 10-100% relative humidity at 28° C).