Search Results

This course is verified by Probitas Authentication as meeting the AS9104/3A requirements for continuing Professional Development. In the Aerospace Industry there is a focus on Defect Prevention to ensure that quality goals are met. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plan activities are recognized as being one of the most effective, on the journey to Zero Defects. This two-day course is designed to explain the core tools of Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA), Process Flow Diagrams, Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plans as described in AS13100 and RM13004.

The calibration of Engine Control Units (ECUs) for road vehicles is challenged by stringent legal and environmental regulations, coupled with short development cycles. The growing number of vehicle variants, although sharing similar engines and control algorithms, requires different calibrations. Additionally, modern engines feature increasingly number of adjustment variables, along with complex parallel and nested conditions within the software, demanding a significant amount of measurement data during development. The current state-of-the-art (White Box) model-based ECU calibration proves effective but involves considerable effort for model construction and validation. This is often hindered by limited function documentation, available measurements, and hardware representation capabilities. This article introduces a model-based calibration approach using Neural Networks (Black Box) for two distinct ECU functional structures with minimal software documentation.

The aerospace industry is focused on fostering a positive safety culture and competency in Human Factors considerations supports competencies crucial to an organization's quality management and safety. Many standards include requirements for embedding Human Factors within the aerospace manufacturing and supply chains. This course introduces the skills and knowledge supporting compliance and capability in human performance. This course provides an overview of Human Factors management in aviation and clarifies what individuals and companies can do to optimize the effects of Human Factors within their organization.

The issue of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the transportation sector is widely acknowledged. Recent years have witnessed a push towards the electrification of cars, with many considering it the optimal solution to address this problem. However, the substantial battery packs utilized in electric vehicles contribute to a considerable embedded ecological footprint. Research has highlighted that, depending on the vehicle's size, tens or even hundreds of thousands of kilometers are required to offset this environmental burden. Human-powered vehicles (HPVs), thanks to their smaller size, are inherently much cleaner means of transportation, yet their limited speed impedes widespread adoption for mid-range and long-range trips, favoring cars, especially in rural areas. This paper addresses the challenge of HPV speed, limited by their low input power and non-optimal distribution of the resistive forces.

As environmental concerns have taken the spotlight, electrified powertrains are rapidly being integrated into vehicles across various brands, boosting their market share. With the increasing adoption of electric vehicles, market demands are growing, and competition is intensifying. This trend has led to stricter standards for noise and vibration as well. To meet these requirements, it is necessary to not only address the inherent noise and vibration sources in electric powertrains, primarily from motors and gearboxes, but also to analyze the impact of the spline power transmission structure on system vibration and noise. Especially crucial is the consideration of manufacturing discrepancies, such as pitch errors in splines, which various studies have highlighted as contributors to noise and vibration in electric powertrains. This paper focuses on comparing and analyzing the influence of spline pitch errors on two layout configurations of motor and gearbox spline coupling structures.

Electric vehicles offer cleaner transportation with lower emissions, thus their increased popularity. Although, electric powertrains contribute to quieter vehicles, the shift from internal combustion engines to electric powertrains presents new Noise, Vibration, and Harshness challenges. Unlike traditional engines, electric powertrains produce distinctive tonal noise, notably from motor whistles and gear whine. These tonal components have frequency content, sometimes above 10 kHz. Furthermore, the housing of the powertrain is the interface between the excitation from the driveline via the bearings and the radiated noise (NVH). Acoustic features of the radiated noise can be predicted by utilising the transmitted forces from the bearings. Due to tonal components at higher frequencies and dense modal content, full flexible multibody dynamics simulations are computationally expensive.

Launch vehicles are vulnerable to aeroelastic effects due to their lightweight, flexible, and higher aerodynamic loads. Aeroelasticity research has therefore become an inevitable concern in the development of the Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV). RLV is the space analogy of an aircraft, a unanimous solution to achieve more affordable access to space. The lightweight control surface of the RLV signifies the relevance of the study on control effectiveness. It is the capability of a control surface such as an elevon or rudder to produce aerodynamic forces and moments to change the launch vehicle's orientation and maneuver it along the intended flight path. The static aeroelastic problem determines the efficiency of control, aircraft trim behaviour, static stability, and maneuvering quality in steady flight conditions. In this study, static aeroelastic analysis was performed on a typical RLV using MSC/NASTRAN inbuilt aerodynamics.